Fiche - Jurisprudence CMR

Numéro de la fiche : 42386

Pays : France

Thèmes : CMR (Transport routier international) Prescription (art. 32) Suspension du délai de prescription (art. 32-2)

CMR (Transport routier international)
    Prescription (art. 32) Suspension du délai de prescription (art. 32-2) effet

CMR (Transport routier international)
    Prescription (art. 32) Suspension du délai de prescription (art. 32-2) réclamation écrite

Date de la décision : 08/10/2020

Objet :

Sommaire :
In this case, the substitute sent a formal notice to the main carrier, who told him that the file had been transferred to his insurer and his lawyer, which does not constitute a rejection of the claim. As the main carrier did not come forward subsequently, the limitation period did not resume and on the date of issuance of the summons, the action was not prescribed.

Référence :
Cour d'appel de Paris
8 Octobre 2020
RG n° 18/16947
Calsina Care France c/ BBL Tps

IDIT n°25005
Bulletin des Transports et de la Logistique, Nº 3803, 19 oct. 2020 p.589

Observation :

Auteur :